<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The return of Muxtape</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zedequalszee.com/2009/02/19/the-return-of-muxtape/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zedequalszee.com/2009/02/19/the-return-of-muxtape/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:32:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Van Hammersly</title>
		<link>http://zedequalszee.com/2009/02/19/the-return-of-muxtape/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Van Hammersly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zedequalszee.com/?p=2456#comment-836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very well put. I completely agree with you about Pandora - I don&#039;t get the appeal at all (though the way it works is cool). Looking forward to reading the Tipping Point after I&#039;m done with my current book. I&#039;ve heard good things.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well put. I completely agree with you about Pandora &#8211; I don&#8217;t get the appeal at all (though the way it works is cool). Looking forward to reading the Tipping Point after I&#8217;m done with my current book. I&#8217;ve heard good things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debcha</title>
		<link>http://zedequalszee.com/2009/02/19/the-return-of-muxtape/#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[debcha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zedequalszee.com/?p=2456#comment-825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I think Scott hit the nail on the head when he described it as a tipping point model. Now we just have to wait and see if it hits critical mass...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think Scott hit the nail on the head when he described it as a tipping point model. Now we just have to wait and see if it hits critical mass&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Snow</title>
		<link>http://zedequalszee.com/2009/02/19/the-return-of-muxtape/#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Snow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zedequalszee.com/?p=2456#comment-824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like everything you said about mixtapes. I feel pretty similarly.

I think the new Muxtape has lots of potential. I mean, hypothetically speaking, the mixtape possibilities are just as great as the old Muxtape. There&#039;s no reason why most artists can&#039;t have most of their songs uploaded even though that&#039;s probably pretty unlikely. Still, if that makes Muxtape legal and legit, maybe it&#039;s worth the risk.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like everything you said about mixtapes. I feel pretty similarly.</p>
<p>I think the new Muxtape has lots of potential. I mean, hypothetically speaking, the mixtape possibilities are just as great as the old Muxtape. There&#8217;s no reason why most artists can&#8217;t have most of their songs uploaded even though that&#8217;s probably pretty unlikely. Still, if that makes Muxtape legal and legit, maybe it&#8217;s worth the risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

